|
CARTOONS
FOR THE CLASSROOM
The biggest audience for our site is middle
and high school Social Studies classrooms, and we have a great teachers' guide here
on our site, but I thought I would give a plug to Felix Grabowski
who does a great job with "Cartoons for the Classroom."
a weekly cartoon study guide done through the Detroit News' Newspaper
in Education (NIE) program, in cooperation with the Association
of American Editorial Cartoonists. Each week Felix creates
a handout that teachers can print out and use to discuss a cartoon
and a current issue in the news. In the latest handout, Felix
discusses the Michael Richards outburst through a Mike Lester cartoon. Download the pdf handout here, and visit
the Cartoons
for the Classroom site. That's Mike's cartoon below, from
the current NIE handout.
|

DECEMBER 8, 2006
Our new MSNBC.com Week in
Review Slideshow is up now.
DECEMBER
5, 2006
HOW TO DRAW POLITICAL CARTOONS
I get lots of e-mails from aspiring cartoonists
asking questions about how I draw my cartoons: "What kind
of pen do you use?" "What kind of ink do you use?"
"What kind of paper do you use?" "Do you draw
your cartoons on the computer?" I get so many of the same
questions that I thought it was time for me to put something
in the blog about the particulars of how I draw a cartoon. This
is just about drawing, no politics here, so if you visit our
site for the politics, you can go to another site now and read
no more.
The most frequently asked question is whether
I draw my cartoons on the computer, and the answer is "no,"
I cling to paper for most of the process, and I like having original
artwork. That's not true of many other cartoonists, and I challenge
our readers to look at the cartoons on our site to figure out
which cartoonists use no paper and pen - I can't tell just by
looking. One cartoonist who amazes me by using no paper is Cam Cardow. Steve
Sack also does everything in Photoshop, making his cartoons
look like little oil paintings. Larry Wright just started doing all of his
cartoons strictly on the computer. The number of cartoonists
giving up paper grows every week. I just heard that Cartoon
Network bought Wacom Cintiq monitors for all of their
cartoonists and is doing away with paper entirely - it seems
that cartoonists and paper are destined for a divorce. Original
political cartoons hanging framed on the wall will soon become
a thing of the past. (Cam
Cardow now tells me that he gave up paper for four years,
drawing on his Wacom tablet, but that he went back to paper long
ago - no wonder I couldn't tell.)
I start off with a piece of tabloid sized
copier paper (11" x 17") and a yellow office pencil,
the kind with a little pink eraser at the other end. I start
by roughing out the composition using the full size of the paper;
this is surprising to some people who seem to expect me to work
smaller.
In the sketch below I blocked out where each donkey went, and
I came back to draw the details in place, mostly to make sure
that the donkeys looked like they were bumping up against each
other, and that their arms, legs and hands were correctly attached
and bending in the right directions. I make use of that little
pink eraser and I draw harder where I see that I need to make
something more clear, just because it is quicker to draw harder
than it is to erase.

At this point most cartoonists would pull
out their pen, brush and ink bottle to draw on top of the pencil
in ink; the final step would be to rub a soft eraser over the
drawings, softly removing most of the pencil and leaving the
ink. Most cartoonists would be drawing on a sturdy bristol paper
that would hold up to the erasing and would resist curling with
heavy ink. I used to do that, but I found that I liked my sketches
better than my finished ink drawings, which looked too stiff
to me, so I started working with drafting vellum and pencil to
make my final drawings keep the spontaneity of the pencil sketches.
(Maryn Turner, Ireland's top editorial cartoonist,
read this piece and wrote to me to point out that he uses a hard
4H pencil on bristol, and that the hard pencil line is so light
that it drops out when the image is scanned, and he doesn't need
to erase his pencil lines at all. Thanks, Martyn.)
I lay the vellum (Duralene, a heavy, plastic
paper I prefer, that you can see through like tracing paper)
on top of the sketch and I draw on the vellum with a chisel point
pencil, the same yellow office pencil that I used for the sketch.
I could use the eraser on the vellum, but I don't because I've
worked out all of the questionable parts of the drawing in the
sketch. I draw with a heavy hand, because I want each pencil
line to show up as if it was ink. Then I scan the art - usually
in two parts because it is too big for the scanner, and I crank
up the contrast to 100% in Photoshop so that it ends up looking
like an ink drawing (below).

Then I save the file as 600 dots per inch,
8 inches wide, bitmap (line art), tiff, with LZW compression,
which will make a file about 400K big, and I e-mail it out to
over 800 newspapers who subscribe to my cartoons. Most of the
papers will print the black and white line art version. I usually
choose not to use gray tones, because they often don't look good
in newspaper reproduction and I think it is more elegant to make
my grays out of lines.
More and more newspapers are printing color now, so I usually
color my cartoons. I'll take the line art, select the black lines
only in Photoshop, and paste the line art into a new CMYK Photoshop
file with a transparent background, then I'll color the art in
separate background layers, with the 100% black lines on top.
I'm not really happy with my flat colors, and I just bought Painter,
so that I can start making my cartoons look like I did them in
water color (Nick Anderson does a great job of this, take
a look at Nick's fake water color done in Painter).
I have to take the time to learn Painter, and I haven't done
that yet. I'm slow to change. Learning something new takes too
much time.
I save the finished color file as a CMYK tiff at 300 dots per
inch and the file will be about 1 megabyte in size. Some cartoonists
save their color files in jpg format, but since I do a lot of
cross hatching, and I don't like for my line art to break up
with a halftone, I prefer to have my line art as a separate,
clean, crisp black layer, this is more forgiving for reproduction
in newspapers that have often have poor registration. Readers
are used to seeing a crisp, separate black line layer in the
Sunday funnies. The color image is below.

In the old days, a cartoonist would make
a photostat of his ink, line drawing for a line art version,
then go back and watercolor the same drawing to get a color version.
Visions of my old, pre-computer days as an advertising illustrator
are dancing in my head now.
OK, got it? Here's one more recent one.
Again, the sketch is on 11" x 17" paper in pencil.
The first thing I did was block in the position of the characters,
then I came back to sketch the details.
In the old days a cartoon like this would
take some time because I would have to collect some different
photos of Iraqi President al-Maliki to do a good caracature.
Now I can do my research in an instant on Google by typing in
al-Maliki's name and clicking on "images." Google image
searches are a dream come true for hurried cartoonists. If I
was really in a hurry and my Maliki looked lousy, I could draw
any old face and put a label on him that says, "Maliki."
Anyone who sees a cartoonist doing that should take a step back
and say, "that cartoonist is one lazy bastard" or
alternatively, "What? Can't that cartoonist draw a simple
caracature? That cartoonist is one untalented bastard."
Of-course, I came close to resorting to a label by having
Bush refer to al-Maliki by name in a speech balloon, but we'll
ignore that for now.

When I was happy with the sketch, I traced
over it on vellum, again in yellow office pencil, then scanned
it at 100% contrast in two parts (because it was too big for
my scanner) and I pieced it together in Photoshop. I "reversed"
the speech baloons in Photoshop because the drawing needed more
heavy blacks. Most people think I work in ink, but that is just
a trick of the 100% contrast setting.

This black and white line drawing is the
image that most newspapers will print.
Then I selected the black lines, pasted
it into a new Photoshop file at 300dpi with a transparent background,
and colored it (below).

... and that's it. Any questions? Post
them on our forum.
I still do illustrations and I use much
the same process for the illustrations. Here is a catalog cover
that I just finished for a nice little toy company called Hog Wild. I've been doing
their catalog covers for many years. Here, the corporate hog
is a super hero, juggling Hog
Wild's new products for the season. The little super-heroes
are wire-magnet characters called Benders. I did it like
an editorial cartoon, first the line art in pencil on vellum:

Here the line art isn't going to be printed anywhere, so I don't
have to worry about gray tones or heavy black areas; I'll have
color to give the image "substance." Here's the final
art with a fancier background than I would do for newspaper reproduction
...

Here's another recent one for a magazine article about Botox
- again, done the same way. First the line art in pencil on vellum
...

Then the color on the computer ...

... and here is how it looked in the magazine ...

OK, now I'm done. I'm starting to ramble.
DECEMBER 1, 2006
Check out our new Cartoon
Week in Review slideshow on MSNBC.com
Here's an interesting follow
up article by Romanesko at Poynter
on the aftermath of the Jose Verela hostage incident in Miami.
Slate has an interesting column (yes, I still read Slate, even though their cartoon
feature is terrible now) on the decline of newspapers and how
it was forseen by the industry thirty years ago, before the internet
was conceived.
STEVE SACK'S AWARD WINNING CARTOONS
My buddy, Steve Sack of the Minneapolis
Star-Tribune, just won the Berryman Award for Editorial Cartooning,
from the National Press Foundation. Since the NPF
hasn't posted his winning cartoons, I asked Steve to send them
to me, and here they are (below). See an archive with all of Steve's cool, colorful
political cartoons here.





NOVEMBER 28, 2006
WE'RE TOO EDGY
Most editorial cartoons are bland, and
getting blander. I've complained here often about the "Newsweekification"
of political cartoons, where editors like gags about the news
with no real opinions. The quest for bland content is everywhere
as newspapers hope to offend no one as a way to keep their dwindling
audience.
Cartoonists often blame syndicates for
the decline in their profession, complaining about price competition
but there is also competition to convey less opinion, to
be softer and less edgy. I run into this every day.
I started a syndicate that sells editorial
cartoons to newspapers (see my syndicate at Caglecartoons.com); a major reason that I
started the business was the softening of editorial cartoons.
I wanted to create a haven where cartoonists are free to draw
strong cartoons, without facing pressure from their syndicate
to "tone it down." Even so, most of our cartoons are
not particularly hard hitting - but editors are uncomfortable
with the minority of our cartoons that convey strong opinions.
Here is a quote from Korrie Wenzel, editor of the Daily Republic in Mitchell, SD, who says,
"My budget can only afford one
service. I love your cartoons! I laughed until I cried reading
some of them. But they are too far out there to use every day.
We need to run a safer mix to appeal to the readers in our area.
I don't like to have to do that but we have to be sensitive to
our readers. Your cartoons are just too consistently edgy."
Wenzel dropped our service in favor of
our milder competitor, King Features' Best and the Wittiest
package. King runs their package service differently than we
do. King has a dozen participating cartoonists who submit cartoons;
King selects from these which cartoons are sent to newspapers.
Some Best and the Wittiest cartoonists complain they are
frustrated that their strongest cartoons are not accepted by
King for syndication. Our service, in contrast, sends out everything
that our cartoonists draw.
Many cartoonists face three editors, each
with a mandate to insure that readers do not have to suffer from
"edgy" cartoons: the cartoonist's own editor at his
newspaper, the syndicate editor, and the editors of the syndicate's
subscribing newspapers, who typically select the most passionless
of the syndicate's offerings of the day.
By trying to please everyone, newspapers
are making themselves boring and hastening their own demise at
the hands of the edgy internet. Editors will follow the path
of least resistance; strong opinions generate complaints; editors
who print no strong opinions get few complaints. I would urge
our readers to compare the cartoons that you see on our site
to the cartoons that you see in your own, local newspaper. Complain
to your local editor when he runs dull cartoons that convey little
or no opinion. Easily offended, complaining readers are the ones
who ultimately are forcing all of us to suffer from bland newspapers.
If readers who are offended by bland content
would also complain, newspapers would be very different.
NOVEMBER 27, 2006
IRANIAN CARTOONIST ESCAPES FROM GOVERNMENT
PERSECUTION
Regular readers of my blog know the story
of Iranian cartoonist Mana Neyestani, who was jailed for drawing
a cockroach that told a mild, ethnic joke. My Iranian cartoonist
buddy, Nik Kowsar, had been giving me updates on
Mana's situation as he was in and out of prison; Nik has been
quiet lately as Mana was trying to escape Iran. Read about Mana's trevails here and see the
cartoon that landed him in prison.
Nik just sent me this press release from
the Cartoonists
Rights Network detailing Mana's escape and quest for asylum.
NOVEMBER 27, 2006 - 23:07 ET Cartoonists
Rights Network, International: Exiled Iranian Cartoonist Seeks
Safe Haven FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA--(CCNMatthews - Nov. 27, 2006) -
Cartoonist Mana Neyestani left Dubai where he had lived in exile
since one of his cartoons led to death threats. He is now in
Europe where he notified UNHCR, the refugee agency of the United
Nations, that he is seeking asylum.
Neyestani left Iran in early September,
just days before he was to be imprisoned for a second time because
of his cartooning. Iranian authorities arrested Neyestani and
his editor, Mehrdad Qasemfar, May 23 on charges that they incited
ethnic violence and undermined national security when the newspaper
Iran published a cartoon with a cockroach speaking the Azeri
language to a boy who was speaking Persian, the language used
by about 75 percent of Iranians. Students rioted in the northwestern
city of Tabriz to protest the cartoon. Iran, a state-owned newspaper,
was closed for months. It resumed publishing September 11 with
a new staff.
Neyestani's months-long search for an
appropriate visa has been followed by his cartooning colleagues
and they are alarmed that UNHCR seems to be his last resort.
"Western countries who claim to have enlightened policies
in support of freedom of expression like to have their cake and
eat it, too," said Nik Kowsar, a cartoonist who encountered
Iranian protesters in 2000 due to one of his cartoons. He, too,
fled Iran and now lives in Canada. "They position themselves
as supporting freedom of expression, but now make achieving asylum
almost impossible for the individual who is at risk for exercising
it." Kowsar serves on the board of directors of Cartoonists
Rights Network, International.
CRNI monitors and supports the well-being
of political cartoonists who find themselves in trouble because
of the power and influence of their professional work.
Thanks to the Comics Reporter for alerting me to this BBC News article about a newspaper editor
from Yemen who was just sentenced to a year in prison for publishing
the Danish Muhammad cartoons.
POLITICAL CARTOONIST HOSTAGE CRISIS IN MIAMI
Last
Friday the newsroom of the Miami Herald was evacuated in a hostage
scare as their Spanish language cartoonist Jose Varela, brandished
a realistic toy gun and a knife, making several, strange demands.
I asked our Cuban cartoonist, Ares, if he knows Varela, and Ares tells me yes, that Varela is a well
known cartoonist and has won several awards for his work - although
I must say that I am not impressed with the quality of his work
(There is a sample to the right).
The crazy incident took over the cable
news channels as well, last Friday morning, and led cartoonists
to speculate about Varela's motives. The disgruntled cartoonist
was described as angry about losing his job at the El Nuevo
Herald (the Spanish paper published by the Miami Herald),
he was also reported to be angry about the newspaper's reporting
on the Cuban community, and about his editor in particular. Another
article on the Herald site (which requires registration, so I
haven't linked it here) describes the recently divorced Varela
as suffering from family and financial problems.
Here is an article about the
incident from the Miami Herald.
Below is an excellent article about all this craziness
from our friends at Editor & Publisher; thanks to
Dave Astor for allowing us to post articles from E&P.
Who Is Jose Varela, Man in Miami's 'Herald'
Drama?
By E&P Staff
Published: November 25, 2006 2:30 PM ET
NEW YORK
Jose Varela, the man who holed up at the offices of the Miami
Herald and sister publication El Nuevo Herald before being taken
into custody Friday afternon -- he had wielded a toy gun -- listed
several grievances behind his action, including pay and the need
to tell the "truth" about what is allegedly going on
at the papers. But who is he?
Varela is an editorial cartoonist for the
paper and well-known figure in the Cuban-American community there.
He is featured prominently on the El Nuevo Herald home page,
with a photo/illustration of him and a list of his latest daily
cartoons. He was recently divorced.
"I'm a happy man," he wrote about
himself on the Herald web site. "Even though I cry if I
see a movie like Titanic. Because I don't like sinkings."
He came to the U.S. from Cuba in the Mariel
boat lift.
Varela had his bond increased to $75,000
by a judge on Saturday. He was initially being held on $22,500
bond. Varela was carrying a knife and a black, plastic toy gun
that resembled a real semiautomatic weapon, police said. He was
taken to Miami-Dade County Jail Friday evening and charged with
three counts of aggravated assault with a firearm.
El Nuevo reporter Rui Ferreira said Varela
had been in the newsroom a week ago and told former colleagues
he had bought sawed-off shotgun and an Uzi submachine gun because
he felt unsafe in Jupiter, where he moved recently. Ferreira
wrote in a blog that he had spoken to the gunman, who told him,
"You are speaking to the new director of the newspaper and
I am going to unmask all of the true conflicts in the newspaper."
Varela called the paper a "pigsty,"
and said it made fun of the Cuban exile community in Miami and
that the paper paid poorly.
"They've been making fun of people
long enough and today they will see it end in violence. But someone
has to pay and that person is going to be (Humberto) Castello."
he said, referring to the Spanish-language paper's executive
editor -- whose office he would occupy before police got him
out. __Varela's work is featured in the book, "Cuban Miami."
This is his mini-autobiography, from the
El Nuevo Herald site:
I was born in Cuba, in the country -- which
means any place that is not Havana -- more than 40 years ago
but it kills me that I do not remember the exact date because
I suffer from amnesia due to stress from credit cards.
I remember that I was always a bad student
because I spent my time drawing caricatures of the teacher; before
long they expelled me from the halls. Since I was not a chief,
nor musician, nor a dancer, nor a ballplayer, nor a dissident
with projects, I could not leave the country -- so I left on
the first boat I could find. That was through Mariel to Key West.
I arrived in Miami and this was a swamp
full of crocodiles but later it was dried up. They put up freeways,
bridges and cafeterias to sell little Morón cakes and
maracuyá juice. Later, a weekly newspaper got the idea
(because they were missing the crossword puzzle) to publish my
cartoons and later they began to give me prizes.
I really would have liked to enter NASA
and become an astronaut, but dreams remain dreams. And in reality,
the Man Upstairs gives and takes away. So he gave me a wife who
never ages, a daughter who draws better than I can and a stout
boy who, if he were to give me a karate chop with his hand, it
would send me to the hospital.
What more can I ask of life? What's more,
I've enjoyed Fidel's fall: tumbling on the floor, not me but
Castro.
I'm a happy man. Even though I cry if I
see a movie like Titanic. Because I don't like sinkings.
NOVEMBER 17, 2006
UPDATE ON THE ORPHAN WORKS BILL
I got this note from the Illustrators Partnership on the current
status of the evil Orphan Works Bill:
It's not yet clear how the post-election
power shift in Congress will affect the Orphan Works bill. It's
possible that one, maybe both, of the intellectual property subcommittees
will be chaired by lawmakers who have been responsive to the
concerns of visual artists. Yet, as legal analyst David Carney
writes in the Tech Law Journal, "the orphan works bill "has
broad bipartisan support," and with a full Congressional
term ahead, he predicts it "will likely be approved in the
110th Congress."
Last September, the bill died in the
House Judiciary committee because Congress adjourned. Had it
passed then, a last-minute "manager's amendment" would
have delayed the effective date of its application to illustrations,
photographs, etc., requiring the Copyright Office to first create
a text-based database for visual works.
The manager's amendment was drafted
during the August recess to meet the objections of visual artists.
Representative Howard Berman (Dem-CA), who may become new chairman
of the subcommittee, told the Tech Law Journal that the manager's
amendment "satisfied" his concerns about the bill,
although he added "Whether it would have been taken up in
the Senate, I'm not sure."
The Senate may still introduce a separate
Orphan Works bill. Senator Patrick Leahy (Dem-Vermont) is likely
to resume chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee. As
a photographer himself, he has been especially sympathetic to
our concerns. It was Senator Leahy's office that invited the
Illustrator's Partnership to testify against the bill last April.
The new Congress convenes in January.
We'll keep you posted. Please post or forward this email in its
entirety to any interested party. For additional information
about Orphan Works developments, go to the IPA Orphan Works Resource Page for
Artists.
NOVEMBER 16, 2006
MORE PAUL RIGBY
Paul Zanetti was
reminiscing with me about Paul Rigby ...
Daryl,
Here's a picture of me with Rigby taken
in the early 1980s with some of Australia's legendary cartoonists
at a city pub. Sadly, I am the only one still standing....well,
good for me....but.....well, you know what I mean!
Of course that photo was taken 20 years ago.
I am on the left (don't laugh).
Renowned Australian cartoonist and close friend, Bill Mitchell
is next (the guy with the thick glasses). Bill was the cartoonist
on THE AUSTRALIAN before Bill Leak. Mitchell moved from
the Sydney Daily Telegraph to The Australian in 1980. I was straight
out of school and I took over from Bill on The Telegraph. Bill
sadly succumbed to a long battle with cancer about 15 years ago,
at his peak and way too young. He was a quiet, generous, modest and
thoughtful man who had an outrageous and hilarious sense of humour.
You would literally laugh out loud when you read his cartoons.
He was a fellow-West Australian of Paul Rigby's and like all
West Aussies, he idolised the trail-blazing Paul Rigby.
Then the jovial and legendary cartoonist, Jim Russell at the
front, famed for being on a Hitler 'hit list' if mein furer won
the war. They found the list after they went through the dead
German leader's files. During the war, Jim Russell did a wonderfully
funny comic strip called 'Adolph and Musso', which I believe
was also published in the UK.
Next to him is Paul Rigby, and next to him is Jim's brother,
Dan, also a cartoonist.
Peeking over our shoulder is Rigby and Mitchell-mate, fellow
West Australian journalist, Col Mckay, who was the one who introduced
me to Rigby through a drunken phone call from the Evening
Star hotel (pub) late one evening, when McKay and I were talking
about my forthcoming trip to the USA, and he said...."Aw....I'll
just give Rigby a call....and let him know you're coming.".
I think it was about 5:00 am in the morning in NY.....the Australian
way.
Regards,
Paul
Zanetti
 NOVEMBER
15, 2006
PAUL RIGBY DIES FROM HEART ATTACK
I just got word that Australian cartooning
great Paul Rigby has died. I followed Paul's work in the New
York Post for years. He had a wonderful, unique, wild style and
the Post printed his chaotic, detail-filled cartoons across the
full width of the page. Read more about Paul's career here. Aussie
cartoonist Paul
Zanetti sent me this note:
Hi all,
... Legendary iconic Australian cartoonist, Paul Rigby passed
away yesterday at Brusselton Hospital in Western Australia. He
was 82.
Riggers was a cartooning legend and icon in newspapers in three
continents, influencing many young cartoonists. I had
the pleasure of staying with him in his New York pad on Roosevelt
Island, when I was a young 19 year-old struggling cartoonist.
He was a generous and fun person to be with, famed as much for
his 'limp-falling' as he was for his cartoons. Limp-falling was
the silly and unexpected toppling from a bar stool mid-conversation.
I witnessed a then late-50s Rigby practice this craft in a New
York bar. What fun!
Rigby started out in West Australia, then moved to Sydney by
Rupert Murdoch, then to the London Sun, then to the New York
Post.
He recently retired back to WA, indulging in his love of painting.
Most readers will remember his cartoons for the little man and
the little dog he hid in his very-detailed cartoons. You could
spend hours looking for them...a loved Australian pastime and
train-travel filler.
Keep 'em laughing up there in the clouds, Riggers!
Paul Zanetti
I think the sample below is an excellent
example of Rigby's incredible work - with details everywhere
and all the space on the page that he wanted so he could fill
his drawings with details that a typical editorial cartoonist
can never hope to draw. (I grabbed this gem Jason
Chatfield's site and that is Jason's characature of "Riggers"
above. Jason mentions that Rigby was at the Stanley Awards last
week to accept the Jim Russell Lifetime Achievement Award.) Rigby
was one of the greats; he'll be missed.

NOVEMBER
14, 2006
SIMANCA'S WINNING CARTOON
Congratulations to my buddy, Brazilian
cartoonist, Simanca, who won the "Cartoons Bridging
Cultures" international cartoon contest in Greece. That's
Simanca (right) celebrating at the Byzantine & Christian
Museum in Athens. Some 415 cartoonists from 62 countries
entered the contest submitting more than 1,100 cartoons. E-mail Simanca. See Simanca's cartoons on politicalcartoons.com.
The winning cartoon is below.
NOVEMBER 12, 2006
THAT BOOK COVER IS JUST TOO BOLD
My publisher is busy printing our new,
annual "Best Political Cartoons of the Year" book right
now, but last week they freaked out. The colors on the cover
were just "too bold" for them and we had a last minute,
cover color emergency, which resulted in the "more acceptable
cover" on the right. We have a lot of offensive cartoons
in this book that will make readers' eyes pop right out of their
sockets, and all the cartoons are fine with the publisher - but
oooh those colors - the colors were just too much. So,
when you see those offensive green and orange colors on Amazon.com (and everywhere else) ... just
forget that; the book really looks delightfully inoffensive,
like the image on the right. (And you can buy it right now on Amazon.com - it will
be shipping soon!) The book is the best of our site for the year,
with more pages (288) and more cartoons (1000+) than ever before.
Too,
too bold.
 |
Ahh
... just right.
 |
NOVEMBER 11, 2006
Visit our new MSNBC.com Cartoon
Week in Review Slideshow featuring the Democrats' election win
and Saddam's death sentence.
BANANA REPUBLIC
I like to give special attention to political
cartoonists who break away from the cartoonist pack. Kirk Anderson
sent me the anonymous review below and great new batch of "Banana
Republic" cartoons that you can visit here. Want to comment?
E-mail Kirk here or
post a comment
on our new forum.
The political cartoon "Banana Republic,"
that weekly wallow in treasonous cynicism, has turned one year
old. Why it has been allowed to fester this long in our nation's
family newspapers is a testament to the depravity of the liberal
media.
The U.S. as an allegorical BANANA REPUBLIC?!
For crying out loud, that's just silly. I mean, really. "Banana
republic" means, you know, some authoritarian regime that
takes power through extra-Constitutional means, that relies on
the military to get its way, that doesn't believe in a democratic
"separation of powers." It's a loaded term. Say "banana
republic" and you think of insane corruption, crippling
debt, massive wealth disparities, crackdowns on dissent, state
propaganda, domestic spying, one-party rule, torture, disappearances,
secret prisons... does THAT sound like the U.S.?! Hellooo?!
No, if the U.S. was a banana republic,
we'd have fishy-smelling elections that require international
observers, we'd be fighting an endless guerilla insurgency and
we'd have rulers who shoot people in the face and get away with
it. Do you even realize how ridiculous that sounds?! Imagine,
for a moment, that Kirk Anderson's dystopian meth-induced cheesy
B-movie cartoon nightmare was even remotely true. Imagine we
all woke up one morning and discovered that the U.S., like some
bizarre banana republic, had changed its laws so we could now
lock people up and throw away the key, in secret, without a trial,
without even giving a reason why. Can you imagine the moral outrage?!
There'd be RIOTING IN THE STREETS!!! Americans would DEMAND their
rule of law, their habeas corpus, their right to trial, their
Constitution! Have you SEEN any rioting in the streets?! NO.
There is no moral outrage, because this is America. "Banana
republic," indeed.
Should we just ignore reprobates like
Kirk Anderson, and hope they and their "harmless" little
"funny pictures" go away? My friends, that's exactly
what they WANT us to do. No, we must instead shine a light on
Kirk's work for all to see, to rob him of the comfort and anonymity
of operating in the shadows. His weekly quarter page rantings
in the Minneapolis Star Tribune are exposed on his own
incriminating home page and elsewhere on the very web site
you're visiting. Do it for the children.
Face it, this is a cartoon for tinfoil-hat
conspiracy theorists who still think the earth is more than 6,000
years old. This is a cartoon for people who don't understand
that freedom isn't free, democracy isn't democratic and liberty
isn't necessarily liberating. This is what we're up against,
people. Happy *$#@ing Birthday to you, Banana Republic, you sick,
sick bastard.
-- name withheld

NOVEMBER 6, 2006
I've added some of your comments below
Derkaoui's comments. - Daryl
NOVEMBER
4, 2006
IRAN'S HOLOCAUST CARTOON CONTEST WINNER
During the height of the Danish Muhammad
cartoon controversy earlier this year, the government of Iran
announced that they would hold a cartoon contest in response, which would
outrage Western sensibilities as the Muslim world had been outraged
by the Danish cartoons. The winner of the contest is Derkaoui Abdellah of Morocco, who is a regular
contributor to our site. I wrote to Derkaoui asking him to send
me a copy of the winning cartoon along with his comments. The
winning cartoon is below, along with Derkaoui's response which I have roughly
translated from his French; his original wording in French is
below the cartoon.
The winning cartoon shows a crane, which Derkaoui describes as an "Israeli war
machine", placing pieces of a wall separating the viewer
from the Dome of the Rock, the third holiest Muslim shrine, located
in Jerusalem. The wall is covered in photos of the Auschwitz
concentration camp.
The Iranian contest was conceived to feature
cartoons ridiculing or denying the Holocaust, responding to the
Danish Muhammad cartoons, even though Jews, or Israel, had nothing
to do with the Danish cartoons. The contest was sponsored by
the Hamshahri newspaper and the source of the award money for
the contest winners has not been disclosed; Derkaoui won a $12,000.00 prize for his cartoon.
The exhibit curator, Masoud
Shojai, said the contest will be
an annual event and added: "Actually, we will continue until
the destruction of Israel." Iran's President Ahmedinejad
has called for Israel to be "erased from the map" and
has denied that the Holocaust took place. Shojai is a former
contributor to our site, see his cartoons here. Shojai didn't disclose
the name of a second place winner of the event, a cartoonist
from France. Shojai is quoted saying, "You can call the
French cartoonist 'Mr X'. If I reveal his name, he may face imprisonment
in France."
According to an Associated
Press report:
The cartoons, which have been on display
at the Museum of Contemporary Arts for Palestine (formerly the Israeli Embassy, before the Iranian
revolution, and located next to the Palestinian Embassy - Daryl)
since August, have not drawn large crowds though state schools
bused their students to the show.
... Iranian newspapers reported the results of the competition
Thursday, but gave it no significant coverage. Not one paper
printed the winning cartoon.
... Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
supported the exhibition. His frequent denials of Nazi Germany's
killing of 6 million Jews during World War II have made the Holocaust
a feature of Iranian foreign policy.
Two of the top three cartoons did not even deny the Holocaust
and could be interpreted as affirming it. The point of Derkaoui's
winning drawing and that of Carlos Latuff, a Brazilian who tied
for second place, was to compare the Holocaust with the suffering
of Palestinians today.
The exhibition was condemned worldwide. The U.S. State Department
criticized it and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan expressed
his displeasure during a visit to Iran in September.
Hajar Smouni of Reporters Without Borders, a Paris-based media
rights group, said she was shocked by the "very poor taste"
of the competition.
Here is my e-mail to Derkaoui and my rough
translation of his response:
Dear Derkaoui,
I read today that you won the Holocaust
denial cartoon contest in Iran. I wondered if you could send
me an image of the winning cartoon along with your comments about
your cartoon and the contest.
I'm sure you know that this contest was
organized for the purpose of answering the perceived insult against
Muslims from the Danish Muhammad cartoons with what would be
considered a reciprocal insult in the form of cartoons that would
be offensive to Jews (although the editors and cartoonists involved
with the Danish cartoons were not Jewish.) This would be an opportunity
for you to address criticism of the contest and your participation
in the contest.
I hope to hear from you!
Best,
Daryl
As
you know, I won first place in the Irancartoon contest which
had the theme: "Why do the Palestinian people pay the price
of butchery for the Holocaust?"
I took part in this contest to express
my support for the Palestinian people and I did a drawing showing
the Israeli wall isolating the Palestinian territories being
lifted by an Israeli war machine; I added a photograph to the
wall showing the Auschwitz concentration camp.
I want to express my total heartfelt
sympathy with the millions of Jewish victims of the Holocaust
who suffered the greatest crime against humanity under the Nazis.
Nobody can deny that more than six million people were massacred
during the second world war by the devil Hitler and his Nazi
henchmen. But the question for me and for so many others is why
the Palestinian people have suffered from so much pain, and massacres,
and why they continue to suffer in the current situation.
As a citizen of Morocco it is my deepest
conviction that Jews are my brothers; Jews have lived with us
in peace and tolerance as fellow citizens in Morocco for 2000
years. I remember that in World War II, Morocco did not cooperate
with the Vichy government of France when the King of Morocco
stood up to the German demands and refused to send thousands
of Moroccan Jews to the German concentration camps. I am proud
of Morocco for taking this noble stand. I am proud of Morocco
which has been and will be tomorrow, a place of tolerance between
Jews and Muslims, who will live here together like brothers.
This is the winning cartoon:

If you would like to comment, e-mail
us or post
your comment in our new moderated forum. Our website
is blocked by the government in Iran and cannot be viewed by
Iranian web surfers, so I don't expect much response from Iran.
Derkaoui's original comments in French are below:
Comme vous le savez j'ai gagné
le premier prix dans la compètition d'irancartoon sous
le théme"pourquoi le peuple palistinien paye le prix
de la boucherie du holocaust?"...et pour exprimer mon soutien
au peuple palistinien j'ai participé à cette compétition
avec un dessin qui démontre le mur d'isolation bati par
le gouvernement israelien et j'ai ajouté au sein du mur
une photo du camp de concentration d'auschwitz posé par
une machine de guerre israelien en démontrant le camp
d'auschwitz je voulais exprimer ma conviction totale et ma sympthie
avec les millions de victimes juifs qui ont subi le plus grand
crime contre l'humanité que les nazis commet.
Personne ne peut nier les massacres du peuples juif -plus de
6 000.000 de victimes -pendant la deuxieme guerre mondiale par
le satin hitler et ses sbires nazis . Mais la question , pour
moi et pour tant d'autres pourquoi le peuple palistinien subi
et encore entrain de subi des douleurs et des massacres quotidienement
? En ce qui me concerne ,en tant que marocain ,vivant au maroc
j'ai la conviction totale que les juifs sont mes fréres,
des concitoyens qui ont bati le maroc de la cohabitation et de
la tolerance et celà depuis 2000 ans ..
Le maroc- mème sous l'occupation française -à
dit non au guovernement de "vichy" lorsque celui ci
a demandé au feu Mohamed 5 (le roi du maroc) d'envoyè
des milliers de juifs marocain aux camps de concentrations allemande..
Ce maroc noble ,dont je suis fier . Ce maroc qui était
et sera toujuors la terre de la tolerance entre juifs et musulmans
qui cohabitent comme des fréres ..
Here are some of your comments:
Derkaoui's rationalization for his cartoon
is inappropriate The Auschwitz concentration camp and other camps
were the result of a deliberate Nazi government policy to exterminate
all Jews. Whatever one thinks of the Israeli wall - it's purpose
is to separate - not exterminate the Palestinians. The Palestinians
are not paying the price of the Holocaust but are suffering due
to the refusal of their leaders to renounce the extermination
of Israel and make a good faith attempt to negotiate some sort
of peaceful co-existence.
Marcyl Seidscher Tell Derkaoui : Whats the
big deal? I see nothing to be outraged about. I not going to
kill anyone,burn buildings,or even beat my chest (or any other
part of my body) just because he has such poor taste and deals
in "low blows" when fighting. When I've sent this message
(I hope you can forward it to him) I'll erase the e-mail and
move on with my life.
Au revoir from USA
Roscoe I saw it differently. I saw the Israelis
showing that the railroad line leading into Iran is actually
leading into a concentration camp. Living in Iran would be almost
as bad as living in a concentration camp.
CBS It's not clear to me why Derkaoui won. I don't
find his cartoon offensive as much as I found Derkaoui a typical
Arab wearing blinders. Auschwitz's walls kept innocent Jews in
(to be killed) while the Israeli wall keeps Palestinian suicide
bombers and murderers out. Palestinians have suffered a lot less
than Christians in Saudi Arabia, than Kurds and Shia in Iraq,
and Jews in nearly every Arab country.
Grossman Daryl,
I thought the winning cartoon by Derkaoui Abdullah was excellent,
as were his accompanying remarks. I took the picture to mean
quite the opposite of what he described though. The wall, despite
itself being opaque, provides a window into the Palestinian soul,
as he depicted it. Behind the wall is pictured the mosque erected
as the result of military aggression and conquest - itself another
window.
When Derkaoui wrote that the Jews and the Moroccans have lived
in peace for 2,000 years, he was, of course, referring to a time
before the advent of Islam in Morocco, since Islam is not 2,000
years old.
When he writes of the suffering of the Palestinian people because
of the Holocaust during World War II, he might forget that while
the Moroccan government did not cooperate with Nazi Germany,
many of his fellow Islamists did throughout the Arab world and
in Palestine. He refers to the United Nations creation of the
modern state of Israel in Palestine on its historical territory
after the War against the Nazis.
Much injustice has been committed by the state of Israel; it
is hardly a democratic state, since is built fundamentally on
exclusion and segregation and discrimination. It is guilty of
war crimes. However, the Palestinian people have time and time
again brought death and destruction on their own heads and by
their own actions sought to justify every evil thing that has
befallen them. Live in hate - die in hate.
The American government has been much more generous to the Palestinians
than their Arab and Islamic "friends" have been, because
it has often sought to provide the tools of economic growth and
peace, rather than selling them the weapons of war and self-destruction.
The U.S. has given voice to the protesters who exercise their
freedom of speech in the universities and the press and on TV
of this country. It has allowed the publication and distribution
of their books, newspaper articles and magazines. It has allowed
the debate necessary to truth. Find the equivalent among the
Islamists and support that instead of the current Iranian regime.
Yes, Daryl, a great cartoon. What did you see in it?
Howard
(It struck me as typical, we're used
to seeing Israelis equated with Nazis in cartoons in the Muslim
world. -Daryl)
________________________________________________________________
I just saw Derkaoui's israeli wall cartoon on your web site and
wanted to tell you how much I agree with your choice. Derkaoui's
cartoon says it all, a real winner !!!!
Cal Wellander
Saugus, Ca. Sir,
I think the picture is right on! I also
sympathies with the Jews. No, I am not a Jew. Just a Christian
who fells sorry for what happened.
Thank You
Etta Hello,
I would just like to state that I agree totally with Derkaoui's
cartoon. I would have prefered posting on your forum but the process is
rather long! So until I have been accepted "properly"
on the forum (hopefully!) I wanted to say that it's unfortunate
but true: brothers fighting brothers.
Thank you in advance for reading my message and many hopes for
the future concerning your site. I say this because I sometimes
find it difficult to comment a cartoon, if you must screen I
understand... but at least let us have a chance! Perhaps it is
my misunderstanding of the procedure, in that case my pardons
but often I find it impossible to even give an opinion(most of
the time positive, but even if it is negative I must say it is
simply an e-mail, only words!)
Finally, good luck with your entreprise, many people follow your
site I'm sure.
Cordially,
Jessica Reynolds
(Jessica, just register, log on and post a message.
We have to approve the messages because of spammers, but if your
message isn't about where to buy cheap drugs or find pornography,
we'll get your message up quickly. -Daryl) Hello,
... In your comments you ... criticise,
that the Iranian Cartoon Contest officially was a reaction to
the Danish Cartoons, although the Danish Cartoons were not related
to jews. This may be correct, but it misses the point.
The official rationale for starting the Holocaust Cartoon Contest
had been, that "the West" did not clearly raise its
voice against the Danish Cartoons with the argument, that they
were covered by the right of Free Speech. "The West"
(correctly) argued, that even cartoons against the church were
covered by this right, and that all of us have to accept to be
offended from time to time.
By starting a Holocaust Cartoon Contest the Iranian side wanted
to prove, that there are topics, which are holy for "the
West", so that cartoons are not allowed - for example the
Holocaust. "The West" would rather talk about a taboo
rather than about holiness.
The Iranian side argues, that if Holocaust Cartoons are holy
(or taboo) for "the West", "the West" has
to accept, that other topics are holy (or taboo) for Muslims.
It is correct, that meanwhile the Holocaust
Cartoon Contest is more than an argument in the discussion about
taboos - but it started like that.
Best regards,
Joachim
Stuttgart (Germany)
(I'll disagree a bit, Joachim.
The Irancartoons Holocaust contest was announced at the height
of the Danish Muhammad cartoons controversy both to offend the
West as the Iranians perceived that the West had conspired to
offend Islam, and to show what the Iranians saw as hypocracy
in the West by bringing about what they expected to be a strong
reaction against, and censorship of, their Holocaust cartoons.
The arguments made in the Muslim world against the Danish Muhammad
cartoons centered on freedom of the press, which is a foreign
concept in much of the world; their argument was that Western
governments should not allow the press to print images that are
too offensive. In the West we take freedom of the press as a
fundamental right and our freedoms are not in question. For the
West, the argument about the Danish Muhammad cartoons was about
the responsibilities of the free press in a free society. Any
debate questoning freedom of the press in the West was only in
response to the arguments and demands from the Muslim world which
were, I think, culturally foreign and not seriously considered.
- Daryl)
Check out our latest MSNBC.com Cartoon Week in
Review Slideshow!
NOVEMBER
3, 2006
JEEZ, IT'S ALWAYS SOMETHING
Mr. Cagle,
Your cartoon today was especially funny.
It's good to see references to chess as a mainstream point of
identifying superior acuity. One point: the board is always arranged
so a black square is at the player's lower left. Your board is
rotated 90 degrees. Small point, but the devil is in the details!
Best regards,
Ray West
United States Chess Federation
I'll explain this mistake away by saying
that both players don't have a firm grasp on what they are doing.
-Daryl
NOVEMBER 2, 2006
CNN'S CRAZY SMALL PRINT
Don't forget to read the small print! Cartoonists
are laughing at CNN's chutzpah today as they posted a call for editorial cartoonists to submit
their cartoons to CNN - seems like just the kind of thing
cartoonists would want - the chance to sell their cartoons to
cable TV - right? Well ... no. Scrolling to the bottom of the
page there is a window with CNN's "terms of use" which
reads, in part:
By submitting your material, for good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which you hereby
acknowledge, you hereby grant to CNN and its affiliates a non-exclusive,
perpetual, worldwide license to edit, telecast, rerun, reproduce,
use, syndicate, license, print, sublicense, distribute and otherwise
exhibit the materials you submit, or any portion thereof, as
incorporated in any of their programming or the promotion thereof,
in any manner and in any medium or forum, whether now known or
hereafter devised, without payment to you or any third party.
You represent and warrant to CNN that you have the full legal
right, power and authority to grant to CNN the license provided
for herein, that you own or control the complete exhibition and
other rights to the materials you submitted for the purposes
contemplated in this license and that neither the materials nor
the exercise of the rights granted herein shall infringe upon
or violate the right of privacy or right of publicity of, or
constitute a libel or slander against, or violate any common
law or any other right of, any person or entity. This license
shall be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia.
CNN has the right to edit and/or alter
any submission. CNN reserves the right not to use the material
you submit at all and/or as little of the material as it chooses.
You acknowledge and agree that by submitting
your material you are not entering into an employment relationship
with CNN and that no relationship is created other than licensor/licensee.
CNN values your privacy. The information
you submit is subject to our privacy policy.
CNN's terms are so outrageously absurd
that they would make a good cartoon - if only they weren't so
wordy. I posted this because cartoonists are always deciding
what they think readers will find funny, it is only fair that
our readers should see what cartoonists find funny.
SOME MORE RESPONSES ON THE HARVARD CARTOONIST
Dear Mr. Cagle, et al,
The most noted plagiarist in America is
Doris Kearns Goodwin who won a Pulitzer Prize for her book on
the Kennedys which, of-course, turned out to be plagiarized.
After she was found out she had to return the Pulitzer and settled
out of court with the original author that she had copied from.
Ms. Goodwin sits on the Harvard Board of Overseers. So what is
the message to the student body - plagiarism pays? So why are
you surprised when a couple of students, bright little buggers
that they are, follow the example set by a member of the Board?
Issaquah Jack If it was
Henry Ford's idea, is every car on the road a plagiarized one?
Three guitarists and a drummer--hey, that was my idea!
Concepts cannot be copyrighted, only an instantiation of the
concept. If I take a photo of the Statue of Liberty and you take
a photo of the Statue of Liberty, we can each copyright our own
image. Neither of us made the camera or the Statue. Plagiarism
is too strong a word for the student's practice, but it does
seem to go a bit beyond emulation, which is a necessary step
toward originality.
Steve Moskowitz
Boston, MA Daryl--
Being in Japan and not following the controversy on line about
the Harvard student's cartooning plagiarism, I can't comment
on all the particulars. But as someone who works for a major
university, I'm quite aware that any serious school will have
policies on plagiarism and academic dishonesty. My school does.
So if this student is guilty of plagiarism, she deserves punishment
under whatever guidelines Harvard sets forth. However, being
fired from a student newspaper is probably a bit excessive, but
that might be the policy of the paper in such a case. Certainly
being pilloried in the press--locally there at Harvard and in
wider venues such as this--is not warranted.
Sincerely,
Bren Shuler
UMUC Asia
Tokyo, Japan It is through deductive reasoning
that that a sober conclution is attained in refering to the case
of "The copy cat". First a student must look to the
master for instruction which in the case of art usaully comes
by way of coping and learng the basics.Some where along the way
after this initial phase the student if promissing takes flight
with original ideas.It's like learning music,first your learn
the basic rules of classical music,then you study jazz,where
you learn to be creative in breaking the rules,then all else
follows whether it be country,R&B,latin,rock etc.Copying,is
just the very basics of learning and that process may sometimes
last a lifetime for after all we are all students till the day
we die.I would think that such a famous institution as Harvard
could be more humble and understanding.
T. Maysonet Having been a college instructor for
a number of years, my first thought after reading Daryl Cagle's
column was, "Where were the editor and advisor?" Ultimately,
this should be a hard learned lesson for you, as editor, and
for the student cartoonist. However, if anyone, the advisor to
the Crimson is the one who should be publicly explaining his
or herself. Where was the advisor when both you and the cartoonist
needed guidance and advising? The responsibility for this
situation lies with the faculty advisor as well.
I don't condone plagiarism. But this went on long enough and
was obvious enough (even one of the other student cartoonists
notices the pattern) that the fault cannot and should not rest
solely on this student cartoonist's shoulders. There should be
a whole lot less grandstanding and a whole lot more mea culpa
coming out of Harvard.
Yvonne Thompson
Monroe, Washington
In response to Yvonne: One anonymous
e-mailer who claimed to work for the Harvard Crimson explained
to me that the newspaper is entriely student run, with no faculty
involvement - if that is true, then this would seem to be a demonstration
of amateur ethics, something which is clearly not a good idea.
-Daryl I think Harvard's
reponse was a bit strong. It's an internal matter that travels
what at first seems a fine line; "Do we handle this internally
or do we let the public that we serve know plagarism happened
here?" I think I'd go with handling it internally first,
save the school's tush and the paper's rep later.
That said, David Brown mentioned in the
Cagle newsletter that we're throwing a fuss over a cartoon and
"So What as long as they are funny?". Frankly it's
more than that David, mainly because we are talking about an
artist's hard work. We have companies of all shapes and sizes
and genres attempting on a fairly frequent basis to steal the
very art cartoonists, photographers, illustrators and sculptors
have attemtped to create for their own monetary gain. If I created
that art, I deserve payment, and I shouldn't have to chase after
that payment. I really think that it's admirable
that Cagle has been well-spoken about the principles he believes
in. There are many people out here who would extort the situation
to take advantage of it. And I have to say that I agree and don't
think it was wise to put her name to the press for a mistake
either, no matter how deserved people think it would be. In fact,
who do you think benefits most from having people find out that
a COLLEGE STUDENT HAS MADE A MISTAKE, the college? the student?
people who love to follow sensational news?
Jason J. Wong
Hey, when an Arab cartoonist plagiarized ideas,
you came down hard on him, and rightly so. But if a sweet college
co-ed does it, it's sort of all right? Pardon me, but is there
a double standard here??
Cathy Lester
In response to Cathy: You might recall that the Arab cartoonist,
Ali al-Ghamdi, sent me a photo of a kid that he claimed to be
a photo of himself and told me he was a 16 year old student,
as a ploy to get me to take down the examples of his plagiarised
cartoons - and it worked, I took them down - until I heard from
a number of sources that he was lying and was really an adult.
Read
more about it, see the bogus photo and the examples of the Saudi
cartooni |